E-C- 204 : The Victorian
Literature
Topic: ‘The Oxford Movement’
Prepared by : Avani N. Dave
M.A. - Sem – 2
Roll No: 02
Date: 18/03/'13
Department of English
Maharaja Krishnakumar Sinhji
Bhavnagar University
Topic: ‘The Oxford Movement’
Prepared by : Avani N. Dave
M.A. - Sem – 2
Roll No: 02
Date: 18/03/'13
Department of English
Maharaja Krishnakumar Sinhji
Bhavnagar University
The Oxford Movement
Religion
is an important part of life. The important part of life. The development of
science and modern life do not care for religion and faith but it is true it is
true that the stress of modern life can be removed by religion and faith.
Arnold wrote ,
“Between two worlds, one dead,
The other powerless to be born
’
So, there came a movement to revive the
importance of religion and faith. It is known as The Oxford Movement. This movement is also known as Tractarians movement. It was fundamentally religious in nature and had nothing
to do with Tory-politics
·
The Background
:
Oxford movement was
not political movement but as it opposed liberalism in all its aspect, the
Oxford leaders derived much from the philosophy of conservatism.
Aims of this
movement:
This movement had
following particular aims behind it.
1. To
bring back the dignity of church
2. To
oppose the state authority over the church
3. To
oppose liberalism in all aspect of life
4. To
restore the old customs of the church
The aims
shows that the movement was purely religious movement and not political one.
·
Against
Liberalism :
The Oxford
movement fought vigorously against liberalism of men like Thomas Arnold who
bastioned on the ethnical significance of Christianity and minimized the
importance of ritual of “theological articles opinion”. The idea of the visible
church with its sacraments its rites, it’s priesthood by Christ and its
hierarchical appointments was repugnant to Dr. Anand tooth and nail.
·
Oppose to
Rationalism :
The 19th
century witnessed a fine growth of science. Theories of science proved fatal to
religion. The theories denied the existence of god. The Oxford movement was
oppose to rationalism in matters concerned with the church. It is hard to agree
with G.K.Chesterton when he writes in his book ‘The Victorian age in
literature’ “The Oxford Movement was out of the very roots of its being, a
rational movement, almost a rationalist movement”. With the growth of science
in the 19th century, there was a growing demand that religion should
be put to the test of rational scientific examination. The Oxford movement
stood against too much insistence on reason and proof in religious matters and
sought to revive the faith rituals and dogmas of Roman Catholic religion
“The main spring of the Oxford
movement was the dread of rationalism. The problem for new men was how to check
the growth of rationalism as he saw it in England”
- Huge Walker
This aggressive anti-rationalism manifested
itself in the Oxford men’s affirmation of the miracles associated with the
history of the ancient church and the numerous saints.
·
Inspiration
from the middle ages.
The Oxford
movement was allied with the Romantic Movement and derived much inspiration
from the middle ages. In the words of professor gate,
“The Oxford Movement was in its essence an attempt to reconstruct the English
church in harmony with this romantic ideal”.
“The oxford movement
stood for the restoration of the poetry, the mystic symbolism, the spiritual
power and the poetry of architecture ritual service which had characterized the
catholic church in the middle ages”- moddy and lovetto
The oxford
movement owed much to Coleridge and Scott who turned men’s’ mind in the
direction of the middle ages.
There is much
truth in the remark that the real spirit behind the movement was not that of
Keble or Newman but that of Walter Scott of the Waverly novels the oxford men
turned their gaze to the Middle Ages in order to escape from the monotony of
life and materialistic advancement striking at the faith of the people
·
Church’s
freedom from the state authority :
The Oxford movement stood against
the secular authority in interfering in the affairs of the church. The church
was subjected to the secular authority. The grave inconveniency that arose
from her connection with the state had
been demonstrated by the affair of Dr. Hampden who had been appointed by lord
Melbourne to the post of regius professor of divinity in the university of
Oxford. His idea of dogma as being a pure matter of opinion gave great offence,
not only to the orthodox high church men, but to the Evangelicals as well. This
incident created much dissatisfaction and the oxford men advanced the view that
the state should make the church free because it was more than a human
institution.
“New man and his friends wished also to defend the church. In
view of its divine character, against the interference of the state, which was
disposed to reform it along with parliament and other institutions, curtaining
its powers and revenues
·
History of the
Oxford movement.
John Keble, John
Henry Newman, Richard Hunell, Edward Pusey are famous writers who contributed
to this movement by their writing.
·
Men behind the
movement.
1. John Keble :
He was the originator of
this movement. He was the professor of poetry at oxford. He started this
movement. But he was a Saintly, simple, quiet, modest and sweet natured
simplicity had its beauty and its charm, but as the movement time require, such
a man like Keble, cannot be the leader of the movement. So the real leader was
another man.
2. John Henry Newman :
He was the true soul and
spirit behind the Oxford movement. He was a genius of broad sweep of wider
range. He began as a protestant and ended as a roman catholic. After his return
from the continent in 1832, he joined the Oxford movement and soon became the
main leader. He wrote many of the tracts and his one famous tract Tracts XC
provoked volcanic criticism against him so much so that he took refuge at little
more. In 1845, he was converted to the Roman Catholic and was made the cardinal
in 1879.
3. Richard Hurrel Froude :
R.H. Froude was a
brilliant man. He was like a link between Keble and Newman. In the words of
J.L.May :
“Froude’s part in the movement was brief,
but it was all important. He was the match that fired the train. He brought
Keble and Newman to understand each other, and that was an achievement pregnant
with consequences.”
Froude is chiefly known for
his remains and two of the tracts for the time and a few poems.
4. Edward Pusey :
He originated Puseyism.
It was a form of Anglican which came nearest to Rome without being merged into
romanticism. He was a learned man but no match to Newman.
“He is
far less attractive as a personality more questionable in his methods and
immeasurably inferior as a literary craftsman”. –
Compton-Rickett
There are
some more names which connected with Oxford movement are W.G.ward, R.W.Church
cardinal Wiseman etc. They contributed more or less to the movement.
·
The failure :
The Oxford Movement failed
because its appeal to the authority of a Catholic tradition was not of
sufficient defense of the catholic religion against the attack of scientific
and the historical criticism.
·
Influence on
next generation :
The Oxford movement was definitely a
religious movement but it had influence on the literary taste of its age. It
inspired the poetry of the Pre-Raphaelites, though some of them were
indifferent to its theological implications it influenced the poetry of
D.G.Rossetti, G.M. Hopkins, Coventry Patmore, R.W. Dixon and R.H. Froude
In fact, in
the religious field the movement did restore to the church authority for the
sacraments and a certain type of saintliness. It altered the accepted patterns
of Anglican thought and practice. The importance of serious prayers, piety,
fusting and personal holiness was emphasized upon and the pre-reformation
church of Rome.
·
Conclusion
:
The movement had
deep effect on poetry except that the movement was a failure. Yet, it is useful
to understand the literature of the time.
Hello Avani,You describe all the points of the topic very well.It is useful in exam.Good Luck.Thanks..
ReplyDeleteHello friend,
ReplyDeleteyou have covered good content, and explanation is very good.You have coloured main point its good.
Thank you bhumi and Bhavna for your valuable comments.
ReplyDelete